bottom

 

HomeIslam Jihad Human Rights Islamic Dawah Muslims Nations Islamic News
 About DJS DJS News Trainings Babri Mosque Speak Now Indian Muslims Indian Riots

Indian Muslims

An Oppressed Minority   Moderen Muslim Agenda  ●  Muslim Population

 

Indian Muslims

 

INDIAN MUSLIMS - AN OPPRESSED MINORITY

By Abdul Haq

India has a unique experience of Muslim minority. A dominant minority in the medieval period became a dominated minority, all of a sudden with the advent of British rule in India. This sudden change resulted into complex problems. Partition of sub-continent in Aug 47 converted the Muslim community of India into ‘Pakistani Muslims’ and ‘Indian Muslims’. This was a great shock as far as Indian Muslims are concerned. The rulers of Yesterday, now had to live under the ‘Hindu rule’. Fifty years having passed, the Muslims who opted to stay in India are still getting a raw deal in every sphere of life. They are still drowned in the scourge of poverty and backwardness. They continue fighting the ever-hunting spectra of communal riots and threats to their religious and cultural identity. The sense of insecurity experienced by the Indian Muslims in the post partition period has been compounded in recent years by the state repression and terrorism under the ‘draconian’, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). Under this act 7,9332 people, mostly Muslims were detained and tortured during 1990-95 across the country. Though the Act has been repealed, yet about 5000 persons, mostly Muslims, are still in jails.

Hinduism and Islam.

Dr Balraj Madhok, former Professor of history at Delhi University while explaining the term ‘Hindu’ said, "Everyone living in India is a Hindu. Hinduism is no religion, it is the name of a civilization (Tahzib), a way of life." He further said that, "Whereas his (Madhok’s) nationality is Hindu, his (Madhok’s) religion is Vedic Dharmi". While giving an interview to ‘New York Times’ correspondent at Delhi in 1966, he said, "In this country we have never insisted on religious conformity and we are not going to start now. However, one thing we do insist on, is that Muslims become Indians. They can worship as they like, but they must adopt this country’s customs as their customs." What all it means for Muslims is that Hinduism is not so much a religion as it is a way of life. It prescribes not only how a man must pray, but also how he must eat, dress, converse, work and die. On the other hand Islam is much more than this. While asking a Muslim to give up all but his mosque and adopt the Indian way of life, is virtually demanding that he should give up Islam and become Hindu. Nobody can dispute that the Muslims have individually and collectively the duty and responsibility to mould their personal and social lives in accordance with the dictates of Islam, which is a perfect way of life, better than any religion in the world.

Birth of Hindu Revivalism.

The Hindu reformers of the 19th century were the pioneers of Hindu renaissance. foremost among them was Raja Rammohan Roy (1772-1833) the founder of Brahmo Samaj, which represented the first throb of modernism in Hinduism. A great admirer of Muslim thought, he had been deeply influenced by his study of Islamic works (including Quran) and by Sufism. Yet at heart he was a staunch Hindu. His deepest yearnings were to turn the Hindus back to the Vedas. He was thus one of the founders of modern Hindu nationalism. The message of Rammohan Roy was carried further by Dayananda-Saraswati, a Gujrati Brahman (1824-1883), who openly raised the slogan ‘India for the Hindus.’ According to him, Hinduism was to be the sole religion of the sub-continent, and the Hindus its sole masters. The Muslims were foreigners and must be pushed out. He devised a new weapon to fight the Muslims. It was the weapon of ‘Shuddhi’ or individual conversion of Muslims to Hindu faith. After the partition of India in Aug 47, thousands of Muslims were butchered cold blooded and forced to leave India. Since then, Hindu militant Bal Thackeray of Shiv Sena and other militant Hindu organizations are of the opinion that Muslims have their own homeland in the shape of Pakistan (though they do not accept it from their hearts), therefore they have no right to live in India.

Alienation of Muslims.

In terms of numbers, the Muslims are only next to the Hindus, totaling 95.2 million (1991 census) and constituting about 12 percent of the population, yet they are considered by the Hindus even less important than the Jains and Buddhists who are only 0.43 and 0.41 percent of the population respectively (1991 census). A prominent Hindu writer S. Harrison admits that the dominant note in the Hindu attitude towards Muslim today is that, "Hindus have a natural right to rule in modern India as a form of long overdue retribution for the sins of the Mughal overlords. It is not enough that unified state with a Hindu majority, clearly dominant over a Muslim minority now reduced to 12 percent, has been established at long last in the Indian sub-continent. The fulfillment of Indian nationalism requires an assertion of Hindu hegemony over the Muslims of the subcontinent in one form or the other." The cumulative outcome of all this is that according to Jai Prakash Narayan, "The Muslim population has been so much cowed and demoralized that they are not acting according to their convictions. They are afraid that if they expressed their real feelings, their loyalty will be suspected."

Interference in Muslim Religion.

Apart from being made to suffer a host of disabilities, political, cultural and economic; the Indian Muslims have often been subjected to a campaign of interference with their religion as well. It usually takes the form of slanderous attacks on Islam made in school text books, or in the press, desecration of mosques and shrines, or deliberate incitement of feelings of religious hatred against the Muslims. In most of the Hindu dominated Indian states, Hindu religious beliefs, philosophy and methodology have been introduced into the text books in the name of Indian culture. This is to an extent that a glance through the officially prescribed school text books leaves an impression that those responsible for them regard India (a multi religious country) as the home of Brahmans and attach value only to their deities, temples, religious customs and practices.

Adverse propaganda against Islam.

The books dealing with the heritage of India exclusively enumerate Hindu heritage and gloss over everything Muslim. The Muslim heroes in medieval Indian history have been treated as ‘aliens’ and ‘strangers’, the book ‘Hamara Purwaj’ prescribed for classes VI, VII and VIII in the state of Uttar Pradesh is an instance of such unfair treatment. A text book on history approved by Bihar State Government entitled ‘Gayania Uday Basic Itihas’ carries an alleged picture of the Holy Prophet under the caption ‘Eishwar Ke Peghamber-Hazrat Mohammad.’ The author makes the statement that the Quran was written by the Prophet himself. It is not only contrary to the Muslim belief but also an adverse propaganda against Islam. The book also makes indecent remarks about Hazrat Khadija, one of the Prophet’s wives. In Rajasthan as well, text book prescribed in Schools contain derogatory references against the Holy Prophet. The Director of education Rajasthan, issued instructions to authors to see, "That lessons in India and other subjects deal with the importance of cow at all stages in a suitable manner." The content of prayers recited in state schools is also very objectionable, grossly violating the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom so far as Muslims are concerned.

Desecration of Mosques and Shrines.

Countless incidents can be cited of the desecration of mosques by the Hindu communalists during the last few decades. In 1961, the Indian Rehabilitation Minister made the claim that all the mosques and graveyards had been resorted to the Muslims. Refuting this statement, Maulana Hifzur Rahman produced a long list of mosques and graveyards not restored to the Muslims but had been auctioned by the Rehabilitation department. Some of the names of mosques and shrines mentioned in the list are Masjid Qazi Serai (near Thana Mehrauli), Masjid Begampur Khurd (near Kalu Serai), Masjid Chuna Mandi, Masjid Mantola Pahrargang (Delhi), Masjid Qabrastan Golebazar, (Thana Reading road, Delhi), Masjid Thana Civil Lines Delhi.Qabrastan village Ladha Serai, Mehrauli, Qabrastan near Dargah Hazrat Khwaja Qutbuddin), Qabrastan behind Thana corporation office, (Mehrauli), Qabrastan East of Eidgah, (Mehrauli), Qabrastan Gurgaon road, Qabrastan Gole Market, Thana Reading Road, (Delhi), and Qabrastan Motia Khan, Pahargang (Delhi).

Tragedy of Babri Mosque.

The 16th century historic Babri mosque was razed to ground by thousands of Hindu fanatics in Ayodhya, (UP) on 16th Dec 92. According to Indian media reports, the Hindu Zealots and India’s one of the largest Hindu fundamentalist political party BJP are again threatening to build a grand temple on the rubble of this mosque. Hindu fundamentalists openly announce that they would, "Purify India of Muslim remnants." It was during 1949 when Babri Masjid was first raided. A group of vandals entered the mosque and placed the idol of Ramlallah. The successive Indian governments patronized the Hindu fundamentalists under different garbs, which ultimately turned into an uncontrollable demon.

Responsibility of the tragedy

It is an established fact that the government of India did not take any action to disperse the mob despite the fact that it was aware of the heinous designs of the unholy gathering. Instead of saving the mosque from destruction a number of government officials were reported to have watched the scene gleefully, inciting the mob to deliver a final blow to bring down the structure. The reluctance of government to either call in the army or Central Reserve Police to protect the mosque, spoke of understanding between Shiv Sena and the Union government of the Congress. Reports indicated that the assault on the mosque was effectively abetted by the guards. An Indian journalist Yuvraj Mohite, while recording his statement in the court of Mumbai said, "Bal Thackeray, founder of Shiva Sena ordered the massacre in Dec 1992 after the demolition of Babri Mosque. The double-dealing Congress Ministry of the then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao at the centre did almost nothing to Prevent the destruction of 450 years old Babri Mosque by the BJP-VHP and other anti Muslim elements". ‘The Statesman’ of new Delhi (2 Dec 92) reported, "The VHP and Bajrang dal cadres were taught demolition methods by a retired Brig of the Indian Army in a month long training camp in a Hindu village in Gujarat State and that the State government had full Knowledge of it". Some Indian Newspapers reported that India’s intelligence agencies had informed Narasimha Rao government’s Home Ministry about the specially trained squads raised by the BJP and VHP cohorts to destroy the mosque but the then Home Minister, Chavan, showed utter indifference and hypocrisy.

BJP vs. Indian Muslims.

The Upsurge of Hindu fundamentalism in the states under the BJP’s rule, Rajasthan, Haryana, East Punjab and Delhi has been a source of serious concern to the Muslim minority there. But the resurrection of the BJP’s rule over Utter Pradesh, India’s most populous state with a sizable Muslim community, since late Sep this year has sent a shiver of apprehensions among the Muslim minority. As the top ranking BJP leader and the man behind the tragedy of Babri Mosque, Kalyan Singh is now again in power in this state. The hard line Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Manohar Joshi, a member of the BJP’s ruling echelon, punished the state government secretary for cultural affairs, Govind Swaroop, a broadminded civil servant, for including Mr. Jinnah (Quaid-e-Azam) in a list of India’s freedom fighters for a TV documentary film and for ranking him with Mr.Gandhi and Nehru in the fight against the British. Shiv Sena, is a Nazi style communal outfit so intense in its hatred towards Muslims that its fascist guru, Bal Thackeray, forbade the Pakistani cricket team from playing in its power base city of Mumbai a few years ago. In order to promote the Hindutva brand of militant Hindu fundamentalism, the BJP led state government of Rajasthan organized a massive celebration on 18 Jun 97 of the 421st anniversary of the ‘Battle of Haldighat’ to honour Maharana pratab as a Hindu hero for his war against Akbar, the Mughal emperor. An Indian Hindu journalist, C.P Bhambhri, in New Delhi’s ‘Hindustan Times’ of 31 Jul 97 comments, "The BJP, RSS, VHP and other allied organisations, without any shadow of doubts are using the culture and history of India to Promote the concept of a Hindu nation which was a victim of Muslim rulers and their purpose is to consolidate Hinduism around a specific religious ethos selectively chosen by political leaders" .He further writes that "The BJP hate list of Muslims continues to unify the Hindus against their religious enemy as revealed by Indian history, the BJP will like to re-write the constitution for establishing a strong Hindu state".

Replacement of Muslim names by Hindus’.

The Maharashtra government’s hostility to Muslims under the BJP- Shiv Sena ministry has been so blatant in recent years that the old towns bearing Muslim names are being systematically given Hindu colour. The historic city of Aurangabad, once ruled by Muslims has been named as ‘Sambhajinagar’ to honour the family of the anti Mughal Shivaji. Similarly a very old city of Osmanabad is being given a Hindu name. Eliminating the Muslim names of many other towns is on the Shiv Sena’s agenda.

Discrimination against Muslim community in services:

According to 1991 nationwide census., Muslims constitute 12.60 percent of the total Indian population. However, the representation of Muslims in the parliament, state legislatures, administrative services, armed forces, police and para military forces, educational institutions and the private and public sectors is far below their proportion. The percentage of the Muslims in the civil and foreign services is less than a quarter of their population. According to a white paper, prepared by All India Milli council (AIMC) and presented to Prime Minister Inder Kumar Gujral, on the performance of Indian Union during last 50 years, there were only 116 Muslims out of a total of 3883 administrative officers (2.98%), 45 out of 1433 police service officers (3.14%) and 57 out of 2159 foreign service officers (2.64%). In central government, Muslims constitute 1.6% of all class I officers, 3.9% of all class II officers and 4.4% of the technical supervisory staff. According to an official report prepared by Dr. Gopal Singh Committee, there is a marked disparity between Hindus and Muslims in economic, social and educational field. The committee’s report based on a sample survey of 80 districts across the country, found that there were only 92 Muslims out of 2698 students in Engineering colleges. The number of Muslim students in the MBBS course in 8 universities of eight states was only 98 out of 2895.

Conclusion

The Muslims of India are in a state of dilemma, whether to accept humility in the form of Indian nationalism (based on secular ideas) or to preserve their Muslim identity. They have to rationalise whether by accepting the secular nationalism they will be given equal status like Hindus or will they remain aliens as they are. The Hindu desire to absorb the Muslims into Hinduism through Indian nationalism still persists. They have already done this with Jainism and Budhism and they are working on other communities living in India as well.

 

MODERN MUSLIMS AGENDA

By ZAFAR JUNG
EQUALITY, justice and dignity form the bedrock on which the Indian constitution rests and from which the concept of democracy flows. Unfortunately, today, there is increasing evidence of bias and injustice against the minorities in this country. Even as the rest of the world makes rapid progress in science and technology, we Indians continue to fight over issues like personal laws, language and religion. Though facts prove this to be untrue, a myth has been successfully created about Muslim appeasement.

Census figures place Muslim population at 14 per cent. It will be worthwhile to examine the gradual drop in Muslim share in government jobs, representation in Parliament and state assemblies etc. The plight of Muslims today is a matter of great concern and anguish for all Indians. No country can progress till all segments of its population prosper and lead a life of dignity and this is true as much for the majority Hindus as the minority Muslims and Christians. Ironically, the minorities are at the receiving end of a campaign launched by people who claim to speak on behalf of a religion that was once the torch-bearer of spiritualism. What can the minority communities do in the face of these attacks? As a first step, a dialogue could begin between the non-political leaders of the minorities.

The Muslim who chose to stay back in India post-Partition is as much Indian as anyone else. His belief in secularism is as firm as his faith in the Constitution of the land. Noted Islamic Scholar and thinker Maulana Ali Mian has been at pains to reiterate his faith in secularism, democracy and non-violence. Unfortunately, the sangh parivar, instead of respecting this position, has been projecting non-descript Muslim clergy to garner support for its larger Hindu agenda. Such gimmicks can only further lower the prestige of the country at a time its image has already taken a downturn. Not to speak of the negative impressions in the West, even the NRIs seem disinclined to invest here in the current climate.

Modern Muslim Mind

It is a pity, then, that the Muslims are falling into the trap of the sangh parivar. The call to withdraw Muslim wards from government schools in Uttar Pradesh following the Saraswati Vandana controversy was avoidable. Muslims must realise that piety includes prayer (to allah) as well as knowledge. The most pious Muslims have also been the most knowledgeable; so the quest for truth via piety/and or knowledge, revelation or science, remains the highest bliss for a Muslim. Thus a Muslim should regard science as integral to Islam and equivalent to piety. In the Holy Qur`an, Allah commands: "Allah changes not what is in a people, until they change what is in themselves. Further, "Your knowledge is not complete until you have acted upon it."

Education and knowledge will open new vistas for the community's development. Economic pursuit and progress have been encouraged in Islam. While the country has witnessed development in education and economic fields, Muslims as a community have not attained desired results. If a survey is to be believed then at least four out of five Muslim women are illiterate which, needless to say, calls for urgent, serious and concerted efforts. The hurdles that lie in the way of our education should be removed, starting with meeting requirements at the primary level. Primary education is the vital first step in shaping the personality of the child to enable him to stand on his feet. This would, of course, mean reforming Madrasa education and imparting special training to teachers so that they can be the architect of the modern Muslim mind.

Nation Partitioned

It is unfortunate that Muslims are not included in national literacy programmes. I would, in these circumstances, strongly advocate the constitution of committee of Ulema and non-political leaders of Muslims so that they can dispassionately suggest immediate solutions to these problems. The government, for its part, should also introspect official shortcomings in the area of Muslim development, though it is doubtful if the present dispensation will rise to the occasion.

There is no time to lose. The politics of communalism saw the nation partitioned. We cannot afford to have that happen again. To believe that 140 million Muslims or 12 Million Christians can be beaten into submission is to believe in the impossible.

 

 

Population of Minorities

In a letter to the editor of a New Delhi based national daily a reader, Ram Bharose, wrote:

Sir:
Hindus all over the world are getting sick and tired of being pushed around in their own country...We are tired of the Governments appeasement of the Muslims. Why should they be allowed to have four wives in order to procreate more so that one day they will out-number our Hindu brethren?

Yours faithfully,
Ram Bharose.

The letter hardly says anything that has not been said before, by communal propagandists. Bal Thackeray too, reportedly, alleged that Muslims had increased from 10 to 25 crores in the last two years. Communal forces of the Sangh Parivar have pilloried the Muslim minority community for the explosive growth of the Indian population. With great conviction they express reasons why Muslims will soon outnumber Hindus. Their reasoning goes like this:

  • As they generally are opposed to family planning, the birth rate among them is much higher than in other religious communities.

  • As Muslims are allowed to have four wives, they invariably have more children.

  • Their numbers have also been increasing due to conversions.

  • Their growth rate being higher they will soon outnumber Hindus.

These and other allegations are made so often by the communal forces that they become cliches accepted as facts. And when communal forces take control, the dividing line between myth and reality gets blurred.

Facts, on the other hand, are deliberately ignored and suppressed as for instance, the in-depth survey project that had been carried out by the Anthropological Survey of India (ASI) in 1994. Its findings set at rest some of the entrenched myths but are conveniently overlooked by those with prejudiced minds. (See box)

MYTH "Muslims do not practice family planning because of their religion"
FACT According to the Operation Research Group (ORG)1 of Baroda, the number of Muslims practicing birth control is increasing: Couples Practicing Family Planning are as follows:

 

 

Couples in Child Bearing Age

 
 

YEAR

HINDUS

MUSLIMS

 
 

1970

14%

9%

 
 

1980

36.1%

22.5%

 

 

1988-89

46%

34%

 
 
 

Eligible Couples Increased

 
 

YEAR

HINDUS

MUSLIMS

 
 

1970-1980

22.1%

13.5%

 
 

1980-1989

10%

11%

 

According to a 1980 ORG survey, 52% among Muslims and 9% among Hindus refused to accept family planning but for the period 1980-1989, (i) 11.5% additional Muslims began to accept permanent family planning methods, and for the same period 10% more Hindus accepted permanent methods of family planning and (ii) acceptance of temporary birth control methods increased by 5 to 10% Evidently, Muslims are increasingly taking to family planning especially in recent times.

MYTH "Muslims have a higher rate of growth of population" (and will soon outnumber Hindus).
FACT The population growth figures do not support this claim. The growth rate of Muslims is only marginally higher than that of Hindus. There has been no dramatic increase in the Muslim population, as compared to Hindus. The following will corroborate this point: 

 

Growth Rate

 
 

YEAR

HINDUS

MUSLIMS

 
 

1951

323,000,000

35,000,000

 
1981 550,000,000 76,000,000
 

Growth Percentage

 
 

YEAR

HINDUS

MUSLIMS

 
 

1961

83.45%

10.69%

 
1981 82.35% 11.73%

In spite of these facts, the forces of the Hindu right attempt at undermining the intelligence of the masses by propagating that Muslims will outnumber Hindus in the not-too-distant future.

 

Trends in Fertility Lever Decline (1971-1981)

 
 

AREA

HINDUS

MUSLIMS

 
 

RURAL

20%

17.3%

 
 

URBAN

20.1%

18.5%

 
 

Source : Census of India 1991

 

On the question of the link between religion and fertility, demographers point out that the former has no significant impact on fertility. Sociologist, R.A.Chaudhary, states, "The observed differences in fertility are mostly due to socio-economic differences between Muslims and other religious groups. Once these differences are accounted for the fertility differences between Muslims and other religious communities will largely disappear".
Worth noting too is the curious reversal of the pattern in Jammu and Kashmir, a Muslim majority State. The fertility rate of Hindus here is almost twice that of Muslims. According to recent figures for 1989-90, the State had a lower birth rate (31.4 per 1000) than U.P(36.5), M.P(36.4), Bihar(34.8) and Rajasthan (33.4).

If religion is the sole or the most important yardstick for fertility, this could not have happened! Further, the situation in more advanced States -- advanced in social terms -- like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka, the fertility rate is low for both Hindus and Muslims. This suggests that socio-economic backwardness leads to higher fertility. That it is indeed so is borne out by data given by the Registrar General of India: fertility levels decline with an increase in the level of education and per capita monthly expenditure (i.e higher the per capita expenditure, lower the fertility)
Other crucial factors influencing population growth rate include (i) Education and (ii) Infant Mortality Rate (The number of infant deaths per 1000 children born alive in a year)
(i) According to R.H.Cassen, a social scientist with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, "The contribution of education to fertility decline is not just by the alternation of parent's aspirations, but by the spread of rationality itself. The basic differentiator of those for whom babies just come and those for whom the number that come as a result of more or less deliberate choice, seems so often to be education". According to a National Survey Sample of 1990 the level of education for every 1,000 persons in every age group, is lower for Muslims (compared to Hindus) both in rural and urban areas -- and this is particularly true among women.
(ii) On the relationship between IMR and fertility Cassen further observers,"...what people want is not just children but surviving children. When children are known to be likely to die, the whole psychological nature of child-bearing is likely to be far removed from the careful consideration of supportable numbers.
In sum, the real reason for high fertility rates among Muslims are low socio-economic achievements in terms of literacy and education, health and nutrition, and the status of women. It has nothing to do with religion as such.

MYTH "As Muslims are allowed to have 4 wives they invariably have more children"
FACT This statement is false because :
Polygamy exists among both Hindus and Muslims. It is legally sanctioned among Muslims to marry four wives. Among Hindus and other communities though it is illegal there is virtual social sanction for such marriages. The question however is: how many men actually marry four times? According to the Government census of 1961 its survey of polygamous marriages the findings were as follows:
Polygamous marriages were highest among adivasis, Buddhists, Jains, and Hindus, in that order. Muslims figured last on the list. The National Survey Commission on the Status of Women in India (1975) found that incidence of bigamy and polygamy is higher among Hindus than Muslims.

 

Polygamous Families

 
 

YEAR

HINDUS

MUSLIMS

 
 

1931-41

6.79%

7.29%

 
 

1941-51

7.15%

7.06%

 
 

1951-61

5.06%

4.31%

 

Moreover, according to this Report, this practice was lower for Muslims than for Hindus for the later two decades. Infact, Indian Muslims generally don't have four wives barring exceptions. Thus it is very clear that the extent of polygamy among Muslims is either same or less than among Hindus and secondly due to polygamy the Muslims population growth cannot be higher than the Hindus population growth. Lastly, the logic of polygamy leading to a population explosion has no basis since the reproductive rate is dependent on the number of women in the reproductive age group. Whatever one may think of polygamy, it is clear that the question of whether four women share a common husband or have separate ones is immaterial to their reproductive capacity.

MYTH "Muslim population is also rising due to conversions"

Witness Meenakshipuram in Tamil Nadu in 1981. And was not the right to propagation of religion included in the Constitution at the insistence of Christians and Muslims?
FACT Article 25 does indeed permit "freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion." The "propagation" aspect was debated in the Constituent Assembly. But it was pointed out that propagation was in any case inherent in the fundamental right to "freedom of speech and expression" (Art.19(1)a) and that including the word "propagation" in Art.25 conferred no additional right. In any case, the right of propagation is universal and available to Hindus as much as to any other community or denomination. And that right has reportedly been exercised by Hindu bodies as well to convert or reconvert adivasis, Muslims and Christians in different parts of the country, including Meenakshipuram. The Statesman of April 10,1992 documented one such case in a cluster of Muslim villages in Hathras district U.P. The reporter, Vidya Subramaniam, found BJP and RSS involvement. Conversion by force, fraud or inducement is barred and the rights conferred by Art.25 are specifically made subject to "public order, morality and health" and to all other fundamental rights. The age of mass conversions is over, especially in a plural, multi-religious society. Such events might still take place, but they will obviously be subject to the most searching scrutiny. These are, anyway, rare incidents nowadays.

References:

  1. Bakshi, Ms.Rajni, "Some Myths and Misunderstandings About Muslims", Centre For Education and Documentation (CED), Bombay,1993

  2. Bhandare, N., (et.al.), "A Pampered Minority?" Sunday, February 7, 1993.

  3. Mistry, M.B., "Muslim Polygamy:Myth & Reality", Frontier, Calcutta, August 8,1992

  4. Communal Harmony', Janata, New Delhi, April 1993.

  5. Molake, No.1 & 2, Bangalore, April, 1993.

  6. Krishnakumar,A., "Canards on Muslim," Frontline, Madras, October 12th 1991.

  7. Subramaniam, N.V., "The Way We Are : An Anthropological Survey of India project shatters some entrenched Myths", SUNDAY, April 10, 1994.

 

 

 

HomeIslam Jihad Human Rights Islamic Dawah Muslims Nations Islamic News
 About DJS DJS News Trainings Babri Mosque Speak Now Indian Muslims Indian Riots

Be  Brave ..............

 

............. Join DJS

DARSGAH JIHAD O SHAHADATH, Copyright  2005

Site design, Host and Maintained by SAASONS